We’re Growing More Hops Than Ever, But There’s More to the Story

hop bine

There are many repeated discussions in the beer industry these days.

Beer in cans. IPAs for days. Economic bubbles.

But one aspect that widely gets discussed by beer enthusiasts and the mainstream media with great regularity: hops. Where they’re growing, how they’re growing and what it means to beer – especially craft – going forward. It’s not hard to find reporting on one of the hottest stories in beer, whether we’re talking about hops growing in Colorado, Florida or anywhere else.

Even if it means we may be missing one of the most important angles of this often discussed topic.

Everyone’s super excited that more acres of hops are being planted. That’s why we keep seeing news stories all over reporting about hops going into the ground (and growing upward):


So, of course, more hops are being harvested than ever before. That IPA you really like is getting a great boost because more hops are plucked from their bines:


But here’s where we check in with what these things really mean together. Acres are up. Harvested hops are up. That’s good, right? Well, not necessarily:


All those news stories highlighting the rise in acreages and harvest have been missing something: the average yield of hops has been decreasing pretty steadily. The projected yield of 1,725 pounds per acre to be harvested in the Pacific Northwest in 2016 is the lowest amount since 1998, according to data collected by the Hop Growers of America.

In terms of hop availability, this isn’t a problem. Overall production levels are very high. 2016 would be only the second time in the last 20 years the total number of pounds harvested eclipsed 90 million, representing 16 percent growth over 2015 and not far from double the total pounds harvested a decade ago.

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 (est)
Acres 29,787 31,933 35,224 38,011 43,633 53,213*
Harvested 64,781,600 61,249,200 69,343,900 70,995,900 78,846,000 91,800,000*
Yield 2,175 1,918 1,968 1,868 1,807 1,725*

Instead, lower yields represent a problem for the craft beer industry based on its ambitious goal of 20 percent market share by 2020. With an average of two new breweries opening each day and roughly 4,700 already in operation, the need for more raw materials becomes an issue beyond sheer volume. It’s also one of efficiency.

Because craft brewers use such large quantities of hops – the most recent estimated figure is 1.42 pounds per barrel – our focus shouldn’t necessarily be about how many hops are grown, but how successful the industry can be given a finite amount of space and resources with which to grow more hops.

Slide from CBC presentation "Using Hops More Efficiently"
Slide from CBC presentation “Using Hops More Efficiently”

According to estimates shared by Loftus Ranches’ Patrick Smith at this year’s Craft Brewers Conference, in order to produce enough hops to supply breweries the materials needed to hit production goals for 20 percent market share, brewers need to add about 15 million more barrels by 2020, requiring 21.3 million pounds of additional hops. To do that, based on a recommended average yield of 1,800 pounds of hops per acre, the US needs to add 11,833 new acres by 2020 to meet demand.

Of note: this goal only counts Brewers Association-defined breweries and doesn’t include businesses like Elysian, 10 Barrel, Founders, Widmer Brothers and more, who still source hops from American farms.

Foreign hop production offers some relief, but growers outside the U.S. are already doing their part to provide enough stock for their own countries and as the world’s top hop-producing nation, American growers are leading the way.

So what does that mean for the number of growers we need and what they’re supplying to brewers?

Welcome to “Hop Week,” an opportunity to look into how the production of hops impacts the beer industry, agriculture and drinkers.

Bryan Roth
“Don’t drink to get drunk. Drink to enjoy life.” — Jack Kerouac

14 thoughts on “We’re Growing More Hops Than Ever, But There’s More to the Story

  1. I’m guessing this might be the subject for a post still to come in this series, but how closely related are the decline in the yield per acre and the varieties of hops that are being planted? I’m guessing that some of the sought after aroma hops are harder to grow than the tried and true classics like cluster, summit and cascade.

    1. Yes – more to come, including touching on this exact topic!

  2. I think I’m missing the point of graph #3? It’s supposed to be measuring yield per acre according to the text, but the axes are year and acre?

    1. Correct – it is the average yield per acre shown over that length of time.

      1. Thanks. Then, the Y-axis should be “pounds”?

      2. *slaps forehead*
        Yes. Thank you, Bill. Updated now.

  3. Hmmmm….I’m wondering if the lower yields is simply a product of new farms or new acreage coming online….it typical requires three years to develop a working hop farm so I wonder if new farms are just supplying sub-optimal yields and dragging down the average yield figures.

    1. These figures are for Pacific Northwest farms only, so if that were the case, the overall averages wouldn’t be drastically impacted.

      For example, from 2011 to 2015:
      Idaho lost 600 pounds per acre
      Washington lost 350 pounds per acre
      Oregon lost 300 pounds per acre

      To have that coming from the addition of farms – which wouldn’t be reporting numbers unless they were harvesting matured hops – seems steep. We’d need to have a lot of new farms with lots of new acres not even close to performing up to snuff for that kind of impact. In Idaho, for example, Mosaic saw 2,278 pounds per acre harvested in its first year of tracking by the Hop Growers of America. In Oregon, Crystal had 2,011 for its first year tracked there and Washington had 1,780 pounds per acre of Comet.

      My post on varietal efficiency maybe tacks onto this thought a bit, too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close